Hydrocracking of atmospheric distillable residue of Mongolian oil

Ts Tugsuu; Sugimoto Yoshikazu; B Enkhsaruul; D Monkhoobor

doi:10.5564/mjc.v12i0.166

Authors

Ts Tugsuu School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, NUM, PO Box-46/574, Ulaanbaatar 14201
Sugimoto Yoshikazu Energy Technology Research Institute, AIST, 1-1-1, Higashi, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8565
B Enkhsaruul School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, NUM, PO Box-46/574, Ulaanbaatar 14201
D Monkhoobor School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, NUM, PO Box-46/574, Ulaanbaatar 14201

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5564/mjc.v12i0.166

Keywords:

Hydrocracking, atmospheric residue, Tamsagbulag crude oil, commercial catalyst, middle fraction

Abstract

Many catalytic processes to refine heavy part of crude oil have attracted much interest due to declining reserves of light crude oils. This study focused on hydrocracking process of atmospheric distillable residue of Mongolian crude oil in the first time compared to those of other countries. Residue samples were hydrocracked with a commercial catalyst at 450°C, 460°C, 470°C for 2 h under hydrogen pressure of 10 MPa. The amount of residual fraction (350°C<BP) decreased to 9.4wt% by the hydrocracking of atmospheric distillable residue from Tamsagbulag crude oil. When the ME-AR was hydrocracked, the high consumption of hydrogen was related to the lowest H/C atomic ratio of feed atmospheric residue. The amount of liquid fractions (BP<350°C) including gaseous products increased from 45.4wt% to 89.2wt%, when the reaction temperature increased from 450°C to 470°C. The highest yield of the middle fraction for each sample was observed at temperature of 460°C. On the other hand, the effect of temperature on the yield of middle fraction was not so high as compared with the yields of other fractions. The contents of n-paraffins on midlle and heavy fractions of TB-AR, DQ-AR were similar, but ME-AR’s was around 2 times lower than other after hydrocracking runs.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5564/mjc.v12i0.166

Mongolian Journal of Chemistry Vol.12 2011: 24-28