The effect of tree species on soil organic carbon stock in Mongolian forest
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5564/mjgg.v62i46.4098Keywords:
SOC stock, SOC, Organic carbon, Forest soil, Soil, Tree species, MongoliaAbstract
Forest ecosystems in Mongolia play a critical role in storing soil organic carbon (SOC), a key component in mitigating climate change. However, little is known about how SOC stocks vary with dominant tree species in these forests. This study investigates the impact of tree species on SOC stocks in Mongolia’s boreal forests, focusing on four commonly found species: Larix sibirica, Pinus sylvestris, Pinus sibirica, and Betula platyphylla. Data were compiled from 885 soil samples across 177 soil profiles, representing diverse forest ecosystems. SOC stocks were standardized to two depth intervals (0–30 cm and 30–60 cm) using a weighted averaging method. Statistical analyses, including as ANOVA and Principal Component Analysis (PCA), were conducted to determine species-level differences and the influence of environmental factors. Results show significant variation in SOC stocks among species (F = 8.79, p < 0.001), with Betula platyphylla exhibiting the highest mean SOC stock (110.1 Mg C ha⁻¹) and Pinus sylvestris the lowest (64.2 Mg C ha⁻¹). SOC stocks generally decreased with depth across all species, though Pinus sylvestris showed higher subsurface SOC than in surface layers, likely due to deeper root systems in sandy Arenic Podzols. PCA revealed that SOC in surface layers is positively influenced by slope, temperature, and precipitation, while subsurface SOC is more closely associated with latitude and elevation. The study highlights the role of tree species and site-specific conditions in shaping SOC dynamics, emphasizing the need to consider forest composition in carbon management and climate adaptation strategies in Mongolia.
Downloads
147
References
[1] R. Jandl, T. Ledermann, G. Kindermann, and P. Weiss, “Soil Organic Carbon Stocks in Mixed-Deciduous and Coniferous Forests in Austria,” Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, vol. 4, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.3389/ffgc.2021.688851.
[2] J. Cha, Y. Cha, and N. Oh, “The Effects of Tree Species on Soil Organic Carbon Content in South Korea,” J Geophys Res Biogeosci, vol. 124, no. 3, pp. 708–716, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.1029/2018JG004808.
[3] M. Lorenz and S. Thiele-Bruhn, “Tree species affect soil organic matter stocks and stoichiometry in interaction with soil microbiota,” Geoderma, vol. 353, pp. 35–46, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.06.021.
[4] R. Osei et al., “Tree species identity drives soil organic carbon storage more than species mixing in major two-species mixtures (pine, oak, beech) in Europe,” For Ecol Manage, vol. 481, p. 118752, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118752.
[5] M. Mühlenberg, J. Appelfelder, H. Hoffmann, E. Ayush, and K. J. Wilson, “Structure of the montane taiga forests of West Khentii, Northern Mongolia,” J For Sci (Prague), vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 45–56, Feb. 2012, doi: 10.17221/97/2010-JFS.
[6] J. Tsogtbaatar, “Deforestation and reforestation needs in Mongolia,” For Ecol Manage, vol. 201, no. 1, pp. 57–63, Nov. 2004, doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.06.011.
[7] D. Altrell, “Multipurpose National Forest Inventory in Mongolia, 2014-2017 -A tool to support sustainable forest management,” GEOGRAPHY, ENVIRONMENT, SUSTAINABILITY, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 167–183, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.24057/2071-9388-2019-36.
[8] B. Batjargal, “Soil types and properties in the Khuvsgul Mountain area,” Candidate’s dissertation in biological sciences, Irkutsk, Russia, Irkutsk, Russia, 1974.
[9] D. Dorjgotov, Soils of Mongolia. Ulaanbaatar: Admon Publishing, 2003.
[10] Yu. N. Krasnoshchekov, Soil cover and the soils of mountain forest in northern Mongolia. Novosibirsk: Novosibirsk:Nauka, 2013.
[11] V. A. Ogorodnikov, The soils of mountain forest area of Mongolian People’s Republic. Novosibirsk: Russia: Nauka, 1981.
[12] G. Undral, “Some specific of origins and geography of mountain forest-taiga soil s in central part of Mongolia,” Candidate’s dissertation in geographical sciences, Institute of Geography, MAS, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia, 1978.
[13] O. I. Khudyakov, Soil of the forest-steppe of inner Asia. Moscow: Russian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2009.
[14] L. Natsagdorj and P. Gomboluudev, “Mongolian desertification, climate and permafrost, change,” in Mongolian environment, G. Nyamdavaa and B. Avid, Eds., Ulaanbaatar: Munkhiin useg, 2017, ch. I, pp. 13–90.
[15] Y. Jambaljav et al., “Spatial distribution mapping of permafrost in Mongolia using TTOP,” Permafr Periglac Process, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 386–405, Oct. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.2165.
[16] N. H. Batjes, “Total carbon and nitrogen in the soils of the world,” Eur J Soil Sci, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 151–163, Oct. 1996, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.1996.tb01386.x.
[17] R Core Team, “R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing,” 2023, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
[18] L. Vesterdal, N. Clarke, B. D. Sigurdsson, and P. Gundersen, “Do tree species influence soil carbon stocks in temperate and boreal forests?,” For Ecol Manage, vol. 309, pp. 4–18, Dec. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.01.017.
[19] K. Hansen et al., “Litterfall and nutrient return in five tree species in a common garden experiment,” For Ecol Manage, vol. 257, no. 10, pp. 2133–2144, Apr. 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.02.021.
[20] P. Horodecki and A. M. Jagodziński, “Tree species effects on litter decomposition in pure stands on afforested post-mining sites,” For Ecol Manage, vol. 406, pp. 1–11, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2017.09.059.
[21] F. Achilles et al., “European beech leads to more bioactive humus forms but stronger mineral soil acidification as Norway spruce and Scots pine – Results of a repeated site assessment after 63 and 82 years of forest conversion in Central Germany,” For Ecol Manage, vol. 483, p. 118769, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118769.
[22] J. Daniel D. Richter, Daniel Markewitz, William A. Reiners, and Pedro Sánchez, Understanding Soil Change: Soil Sustainability Over Millennia, Centuries, and Decades. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
[23] S. Rehschuh, M. Jonard, M. Wiesmeier, H. Rennenberg, and M. Dannenmann, “Impact of European Beech Forest Diversification on Soil Organic Carbon and Total Nitrogen Stocks–A Meta-Analysis,” Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, vol. 4, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.3389/ffgc.2021.606669.
[24] I. Schmid and M. Kazda, “Root distribution of Norway spruce in monospecific and mixed stands on different soils,” For Ecol Manage, vol. 159, no. 1–2, pp. 37–47, Apr. 2002, doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00708-3.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Byambaa Ganbat, Batkhishig Ochirbat, Bat-Erdene Khatanbaatar, Nyamdavaa Batsaikhan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright on any research article in the Mongolian Journal of Geography and Geoecology is retained by the author(s).
The authors grant the Mongolian Journal of Geography and Geoecology a license to publish the article and identify itself as the original publisher.
Articles in the Mongolian Journal of Geography and Geoecology are Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License CC BY.
This license permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
