Transcultural Validation of the Teacher Stress Inventory (TSI) in Mongolia: An Exploratory Study of Stress Among School Teachers

Authors

  • Ulziisaikhan Galindev Department of Educational Administration, Mongolian National University of Education, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4686-2469
  • Tumengerel Purev Department of British and American Studies, National University of Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2800-716X
  • Davaasuren Chuluunbaatar Department of Fundamental Sciences, University of Finance and Economics, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5564/lavai.v22i34.5334

Keywords:

Confirmatory factor analysis, Teacher stress, Reliability, Validity

Abstract

Teacher stress has increasingly emerged as a significant challenge affecting both the efficiency of educational systems and the psychological well-being of teachers worldwide. However, empirical studies on teacher stress in Mongolia remain scarce, particularly regarding the development of psychometrically sound measurement tools. This study aimed to transculturally validate the Teacher Stress Inventory (TSI) in the Mongolian educational context and identify the major sources of teacher stress among schoolteachers. This quantitative study involved Mongolian schoolteachers from various educational settings. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) were conducted to examine the factorial validity and reliability of the Mongolian version of the TSI. The findings provided empirical evidence supporting the reliability and construct validity of the instrument. A six-factor structure was identified, accounting for 68.14% of the total variance, with acceptable to excellent reliability across the scales. Both EFA and CFA confirmed the validity and adequacy of the Mongolian TSI structure, and the resulting six-factor model demonstrated acceptable fit indices. Compared with the original ten-factor structure, the Mongolian version revealed highly interrelated stress dimensions, particularly in relation to job-related stressors, time management, discipline and motivation, and physiological and behavioral reactions to stress. In addition, the study identified the major sources of teacher stress as work-related issues and professional expectation issues. The findings contribute to the limited literature on teacher stress in Mongolia and provide a valuable foundation for designing intervention strategies aimed at improving teachers’ welfare and psychological well-being.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
36
PDF
36

References

Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The Job Demands-Resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3): pp.309–328. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115

Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3): pp.499–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2): pp.191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W H Freeman/Times Books/ Henry Holt & Co, pp.241–243.

Boshoff, S. M., Potgieter, J. C., Ellis, S. M., Mentz, K., Malan, L. (2018). Validation of the Teacher Stress Inventory (TSI) in a multicultural context: The SABPA study. South African Journal of Education, 38(Supplement 2): pp.1–13. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v38ns2a1491

Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1): pp.98–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98

Choisuren E., Jargalsuren Sh., Pagmasuren Ts., Zolzaya B., Uranchimeg G., Norovsuren B. (2018) School teacher workload and salary study. Issues and solutions in economics of education, National conference, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. In Mongolian

Dalawi, I., Isa, M. R., & Aimran, N. (2025). Exploratory factor analysis on the development and validation of the understanding, attitude, practice and health literacy questionnaire on COVID-19 in Malay language. Scientific Reports,15: pp.19654 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-04517-z

Enkhtsetseg, A., & Munkhzul, M. (2019). Study on Stress among for Teachers in Mongolia, International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development, 4(1): pp.959-960, https://www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd29719.pdf

Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3): pp.272–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272

Fimian, M. J. (1984). The development of an instrument to measure occupational stress in teachers: The Teacher Stress Inventory. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 57(4): pp.277–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1984.tb00169.x

Fimian, M. J. (1988). Teacher Stress Inventory: Manual. National Education Service. Clinical Psychology Publishing Co., Inc

Fimian, M. J., & Fastenau, P. S. (1990). The validity and reliability of the Teacher Stress Inventory: A re-analysis of aggregate data. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 11(2): pp.151–157. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030110206Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Goretzko, D., Siemund, K., Sterner, P. (2024). Evaluating Model Fit of Measurement Models in Confirmatory Factor Analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 84(1): pp.123-144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164423116381

Greenberg, M. T., Brown, J. L., & Abenavoli, R. M. (2016). Teacher stress and health: Effects on teachers, students, and schools. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. https://www.rwjf.org/en/insights/our-research/2016/07/teacher-stress-and-health.html

Hair, J. F., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., Black, W. C. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis (8th ed.). England, Pearson Prentice.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., and Tatham. R. L. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis (6th ed.), Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Inc.

Hambleton, R. K. (1994). Guidelines for adapting educational and psychological tests: A progress report. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 10(3): pp.229–244.

Hargreaves, A. (2000). Mixed emotions: Teachers’ perceptions of their interactions with students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(8): pp. 811–826. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00028-7

Hermida, R. (2015). The problem of allowing correlated errors in structural equation modeling: Concerns and considerations. Computational Methods in Social Sciences, 3: pp. 5–17.

International Test Commission. (2018). ITC guidelines for translating and adapting tests (Second edition). International Journal of Testing, Version 2(4): pp.2. https://www.intestcom.org/files/guideline_test_adaptation_2ed.pdf

Jadamba, B., Altangoo, O., Batkhuyag, S. (2021). Some issues in the measurement of collaborative learning outcomes. Issues and Solutions in Education. National conference -VII, Mongolia, pp.129-132. https://sas.num.edu.mn/mn/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/ISE-2021_PROCEEDINGS-online-1-251-cover.pdf. In Mongolian.

Jennings, P. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2009). The prosocial classroom: Teacher social and emotional competence in relation to student and classroom outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 79(1): pp.491–525. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308325693

Jiang, L., Yang, L., Yao, J. (2025). Evaluating a new scale for infertility psychological distress: psychometric evidence from China. BMC Psychology, 13: pp.667. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02991-8

Johnson, S., Cooper, C., Cartwright, S., Donald, I., Taylor, P., Millet, C. (2005). The experience of work-related stress across occupations. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 20(2): pp.178–187. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940510579803

Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1): 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000116

Kleinman, A. (1987). Anthropology and psychiatry: The role of culture in cross-cultural research on illness. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 151(4): pp.447–454. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.151.4.447

Kyriacou, C. (2001). Teacher stress: Directions for future research. Educational Review, 53(1): pp. 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131910120033628

Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer Publishing Company.

Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2021). Solomon: A method for splitting a sample into equivalent subsamples in factor analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 54: pp.2665–2677. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01750-y

Miyejav, I., Lkhagvasuren, G., Jargalsikhan, D., Dolgorsuren, Kh., Urjinkhand, A. (2022). Reliability and validity of the TPACK.xs instrument for mathematics teachers in secondary education. Mongolian Journal of Educational Research, 27(1): pp.7-15. https://doi.org/10.56380/v27.1.1. In Mongolian

Ministry of Education and Science, UNESCO & United Nations (2022). “Transforming Education” National Consultation Report of Mongolia, pp.13-15. In Mongolian https://media.unesco.org/sites/default/files/webform/ed3002/Mongolia_NC_report.pdf

Ministry of Education and Science, UNESCO & UNICEF for children (2022). Mid-Term Progress Report Of Sustainable Development Goal 4 In Mongolia (2016-2021): pp.97-107. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/mid-term-progress-report-sustainable-development-goal-4-mongolia. In Mongolian

Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2016). Teacher stress and teacher self-efficacy as predictors of engagement, emotional exhaustion, and motivation to leave the teaching profession. Creative Education, 7: pp.1785-1799. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2016.713182.

Ulziisaikhan, G., Davaasuren, Ch., Tumengerel, P. (2025). Psychometric Properties of the Mongolian Version of the Teacher’s Sense of Efficacy Scale. Mongolian Journal of Educational Research, 30(2): pp.68-83. https://doi.org/10.56380/mjer.v30.2.5. In Mongolian.

Wickramasinghe, E. P., De A Seneviratne, R., Gunawardena, N. S., Sumathipala, A., Mallen, C. (2022). Validity & reliability of Teacher Stress Inventory-Sinhala to measure occupational stress among secondary school teachers in Sri Lanka. Journal of the College of Community Physicians of Sri Lanka, 28(1): 532–538. https://doi.org/10.4038/jccpsl.v28i1.8442

Wei, Q., Van der Heijden, B., Vallée-Tourangeau, G. (2025). Development and validation of the Chinese Teacher Sources of Stress Scale. European Review of Applied Psychology, 75: pp.101004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2024.101004

Worthington, R. L., & Whittaker, T. A. (2006). Scale development research: content analysis and recommendations for best practices. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(6): pp.806–838. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006288127

Yong, A.G. & Pearce, S. (2013). A Beginner’s Guide to Factor Analysis: Focusing on Exploratory Factor Analysis. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 9: pp.79-94. https://doi.org/10.20982/tqmp.09.2.p079

Downloads

Published

2026-06-09

How to Cite

Galindev, U., Purev, T., & Chuluunbaatar, D. (2026). Transcultural Validation of the Teacher Stress Inventory (TSI) in Mongolia: An Exploratory Study of Stress Among School Teachers. Lavai - International Journal of Education, 22(34), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.5564/lavai.v22i34.5334

Issue

Section

Articles