Correction to: Science policy at the crossroads of global change research: Mongolia in Proceedings of the Mongolian Academy of Sciences, 61(03), 1–15.

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5564/pmas.v65i03.4546

Keywords:

science policy, technological evolution, study of global changes, trends, impacts and outcome

Abstract

In the original publication one of the Enkhamgalan Damiran’s proper affiliation requested to change. The new affiliation for Enkhamgalan Damiran changed as follows

Mongolian Academy of Medical Sciences, Mongolian Academy of Sciences, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia” to the  4th affiliation and “School of Governance and Management, National Academy of Governance,  Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia to the  1th affiliation”

The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Co-authors. 

The original article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.5564/pmas.v61i03.1818

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
11
PDF
11

Author Biography

Enkhamgalan Damiran, School of Governance and Management, National Academy of Governance, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia

Mongolian Academy of Medical Sciences, Mongolian Academy of Sciences, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia,

References

1. UNCTAD, A framework for Science, Technology, Innovation policy reviews. 2019, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development: Geneva.

2. UNESCO. Medim-Term Strategy 2014-2021. in UNESCO General Conference, 37th. 2013. Paris.

3. Porter, M.E., C. Ketels, and M. Delgado, The Microeconomic Foundations of Prosperity: Findings from the Business Competitiveness Index. The global competitiveness report, 2007. 2008: pp. 51-81.

4. Porter, M.E., What Is Strategy? Harvard Business Review, 1996. 74(6): pp. 61-78.

5. Porter, M.E., The Competitive Advantage of Nations Harvard Business Review 1990: pp. 72-91.

6. Attri, V.N., A Perspective on Science, Technology and Innovation Policy: Need for International Coordination, in Global Sustainable Development Report, UN, Editor. 2016: New York.

7. Gluckman, P., The art of science advice to Government. Nature, 2014. 507: pp. 163-165.

8. EU, Global Governance of Science. Report of the Expert Group Global Governanace of Science to the Science, Economy and Society Directorate, Directorate-General for Research, European Commision. 2009, European Research Area: Belgium.

9. Schumpeter, J.A., The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. 1934, Piscataway: Transaction Publishers.

10. Lunddvall, B.-A., S. Borras, and R.R. Nelson, Science, Technology and Innovation Policy, in Innovation Handbook, J. Fagerberg and D.C. Mowery, Editors. 2005, Oxford University Press: Oxford. pp. 599-631.

11. Goldemberg, J., What Is the Role of Science in Developing Countries? Science 1998. 279 (5354): p. 1140-1141.

12. Martin, B.R., The evolution of science policy and innovation studies. Research Policy, 2012. 41: pp. 1219–1239.

13. Toomey, A.H., et al., Inter- and Trans-disciplinary Research: A Critical Perspective in Global Sustainable Development Report. 2015.

14. Stock, P. and R.J.F. Burton, Defining Terms for Integrated (Multi-Inter-Trans-Disciplinary) Sustainability Research. Sustainability 2011. 3: pp. 1090-1113.

15. Klein, J.T., Prospects for transdisciplinarity. Future, 2004. 36: pp. 515-526.

16. OECD, Main Science and Technology Indicators. https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=MSTI_PUB. 2020.

17. Medoff, M.H., A Citation-Based Analysis of Economists and Economics Programs. The American Economist, 1996. 40(1): pp. 46-59.

18. Maasen, S., M. Lengwiler, and M. Guggenheim, Practices of transdisciplinary research: close(r) encounters of science and society. Science and Public Policy, 2006. 33(6): pp. 394-398.

19. Hausman, D.M. and B. Welch, Debate: To Nudge or Not to Nudge. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 2010. 18(1): pp. 123–136.

20. Dolan, P., M. Hallsworth, and a.a. David Halpern, MINDSPACE Influencing behaviour through public policy. 2010, Institute for Government.

21. ISC, Open Science for the 21st Century. 2020, International Science Council. p. 28.

22. UNESCO, UNESCO Science report: towards 2030. 2015: Luxembourg p. 794.

23. WEF, World Economic Forum | Annual Report 2019-2020. 2020.

24. OECD, OECD Science, Technology and Innovation Outlook 2018. 2018.

25. OECD. Science and Innovation Policy. Key Challenges and Opportunities. in OECD Committee for Scienctific and Technological Policy at Ministerial Level. 2004. Paris.

26. Boldbaatar, J., et al., XX zuuny Mongol: Bolovsrol, soyol, shinjlekh ukhaany khugjlyin tuukh [Mongolia in the XX Century: History of Education, Culture and Science Development]. 2020, Ulaanbaatar: Udam soyol LLC.

27. Sereeter, C., K. Tserev, and B. Chadraa, Mongol Ulsyn Shinjlekh Ukhaany Akademyin Tuukh [History of Mongolian Academy of Sciences]. 2002, Ulaanbaatar: Shinjlekh Ukhaany Akademyin khevlekh uildver.

28. MECSS, Shinjlekh ukhaan, tekhnologi, innovatsyin bodlogo, erkh zui, statistikyin emkhetgel [Science, technology, innovation policy, legal and statistical information]. 2019: Ulaanbaatar. pp. 26-27.

29. UNESCO, Science, Technology and Innovation. Research and experimental development (full dataset). 2020. UNESCO. Institute for Statistics. http://data.uis.unesco.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=SCN_DS&lang=en#.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-12

How to Cite

Damiran, E., Khyargas, T., Pagbajabyn, N., & Batsukh, S. (2025). Correction to: Science policy at the crossroads of global change research: Mongolia in Proceedings of the Mongolian Academy of Sciences, 61(03), 1–15. Proceedings of the Mongolian Academy of Sciences, 65(03). https://doi.org/10.5564/pmas.v65i03.4546

Issue

Section

Correction