Economic Security as a Concept: Comparative Analysis and Strategic Definition
Keywords:
Economic security, conceptual analysis, comparative analysis, geoeconomics, strategic governance, resilience, risk management, MongoliaAbstract
This article examines the transformation of economic security from a narrowly protection-oriented policy concept into a higher-order framework of strategic governance shaped by structural uncertainty, interconnected vulnerability, and adaptive continuity requirements. Although economic security has become increasingly central to contemporary national-security discourse, its conceptual structure remains analytically fragmented across countries and institutions due to differing strategic priorities, governance traditions, and geopolitical conditions. Addressing this gap, the study reconstructs the concept of economic security through a comparative analysis of the strategic logic embedded in major national and international policy frameworks.
Methodologically, the study combines document analysis, comparative analysis, and conceptual analysis to examine strategic and policy documents from the United States, the European Union, OECD, Japan, China, Russia, and Mongolia’s national security concepts of 1994 and 2010. The analytical framework integrates strategic theory, risk theory, and conceptual analysis in order to identify recurring conceptual attributes, reconstruct higher-order conceptual abstraction, and explain how economic security is increasingly shaped by conditions of structural uncertainty and cascading vulnerability. The findings demonstrate that contemporary approaches to economic security are progressively converging around resilience, supply-chain continuity, adaptive coordination, strategic autonomy, and long-term governance continuity rather than conventional protection-centered approaches alone.
The study further demonstrates that Mongolia’s understanding of economic security has gradually evolved from sovereignty-centered protection toward broader developmental and governance-oriented approaches, although an integrated framework grounded in resilience and adaptive strategic coordination remains only partially consolidated. Based on the comparative synthesis, the article proposes a reconstructed definition of economic security as a state’s strategic capacity to sustain structural continuity, safeguard strategic sectors and supply chains, and manage interconnected vulnerabilities in pursuit of long-term development and national-security objectives.
By repositioning economic security from a policy-oriented category toward a conceptually reconstructed framework of strategic coordination, the study contributes a coherent analytical foundation for understanding economic security as an evolving strategic concept within contemporary governance environments.
0
References
Adcock, R., & Collier, D. (2001). Measurement validity: A shared standard for qualitative and quantitative research. American Political Science Review, 95(3), 529–546. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055401003100
Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity (M. Ritter, Trans.). Sage Publications.
Buzan, B. (1991). People, states and fear: An agenda for international security studies in the post-Cold War era (2nd ed.). Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Clausewitz, C. von. (1976). On war (M. Howard & P. Paret, Eds. & Trans.). Princeton University Press.
Collier, D., & Mahon, J. E., Jr. (1993). Conceptual “stretching” revisited: Adapting categories in comparative analysis. American Political Science Review, 87(4), 845–855. https://doi.org/10.2307/2938818
Council of the European Union. (2024). EU strategic agenda 2024–2029. https://www.consilium.europa.eu
European Commission. (2023). European economic security strategy. https://commission.europa.eu
European Commission, & High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy. (2023). European economic security strategy. https://commission.europa.eu
Freedman, L. (2013). Strategy: A history. Oxford University Press.
Goertz, G. (2006). Social science concepts: A user’s guide. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400842995
Government of Japan. (2022). Economic security promotion act. https://www.japan.go.jp
Government of Mongolia. (2020). Vision-2050 long-term development policy. https://www.gov.mn
International Risk Governance Council. (2005). Risk governance: Towards an integrative approach. https://www.irgc.org
Kirchner, E. J., & Sperling, J. (2007). Security governance in a globalized world. Routledge.
National Security Council of Mongolia. (1994). National security concept of Mongolia. Government of Mongolia.
National Security Council of Mongolia. (2010). National security concept of Mongolia. Government of Mongolia.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2024). The role of resilience in economic security. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org
Russian Federation. (2017). Strategy of economic security of the Russian Federation until 2030. Kremlin.
Sartori, G. (1970). Concept misformation in comparative politics. American Political Science Review, 64(4), 1033–1053. https://doi.org/10.2307/1958356
Senchagov, V. K. (2005). Economic security of Russia: General course. BINOM.
State Council Information Office of the People’s Republic of China. (2025). China’s national security in the new era. Foreign Languages Press.
State Council of the People’s Republic of China. (2021). The 14th five-year plan for national economic and social development of the People’s Republic of China. https://www.gov.cn
The White House. (2021). Building resilient supply chains, revitalizing American manufacturing, and fostering broad-based growth. https://www.whitehouse.gov
The White House. (2022). Indo-Pacific strategy of the United States. https://www.whitehouse.gov
The White House. (2025). National security strategy. https://www.whitehouse.gov
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2026). Global trade update 2026. https://unctad.org
World Economic Forum. (2026). The global risks report 2026 (21st edition). https://www.weforum.org
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Tuvshintugs Adiya

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright on any research article in the Mongolian Geoscientist is retained by the author(s).
The authors grant the Mongolian Journal of Economic Review a license to publish the article and identify itself as the original publisher.

Articles in the Mongolian Journal of Economic Review are Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons ATTRIBUTION-NONCOMMERCIAL-NODERIVS 4.0 INTERNATIONAL - CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.
This license permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.