Psychometric Properties of the Mongolian Version of the Experiences in Close Relationships–Revised Child Version

Authors

  • Bayarmaa Tsend Department of Psychology, School of Educational Studies, Mongolian National University of Education, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7179-0618
  • Nominzul Nasanbat Brain and Mind Research Institute, Mongolian Academy of Sciences, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
  • Enkhmanlai Batsukh Department of Psychology, School of Educational Studies, Mongolian National University of Education, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
  • Uranbileg Sainbat The Spectrum Support Center, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
  • Buyanzaya Marsgerel The Spectrum Support Center, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
  • Naidan Bat-Ulzii Brain and Mind Research Institute, Mongolian Academy of Sciences, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5564/lavai.v22i34.4598

Keywords:

Attachment , Adolescents , Anxiety , Children

Abstract

In this study, we initially examined the psychometric properties of the Mongolian version of the Experiences in Close Relationships–Revised Child version (ECR-RC) based on 434 secondary school students’ data. Of these, data from 427 participants were included in the validity analyses, and 374 participants completed a two-week retest. Reliability and construct validity were evaluated using internal consistency analysis, test–retest reliability, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, and indices of convergent and discriminant validity. The expected two-factor structure, comprising attachment anxiety and attachment avoidance, was generally supported. However, several items were removed during model refinement because of low factor loadings or problematic cross-loadings, resulting in a final 24-item model. 24-item model demonstrated acceptable fit for both the father form (RMSEA = 0.0475, SRMR = 0.0507, CFI = 0.932, TLI = 0.923) and the mother form (RMSEA = 0.0474, SRMR = 0.0499, CFI = 0.931, TLI = 0.921). Reliability was satisfactory across both parental contexts, with composite reliability values above 0.70 and two-week intra-class correlation coefficients for individual items ranging from 0.731 to 0.888. Discriminant validity was supported, whereas convergent validity received only partial support. Overall, the findings indicate that the Mongolian ECR-RC demonstrates good reliability and acceptable psychometric properties for assessing attachment-related anxiety and avoidance in children and adolescents; however, further validation using independent and more diverse samples is recommended.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
30
PDF
36

References

Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation (3rd ed.). Psychology Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1980-50809-000

Ambuehl, B., & Inauen, J. (2022). Contextualized Measurement Scale Adaptation: A 4-Step Tutorial for Health Psychology Research. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(19): pp.12775. https://doi.org/10.3390/IJERPH191912775/S1

Bosmans, G., Poiana, N., Van Leeuwen, K., Dujardin, A., De Winter, S., Finet, C., Heylen, J., Van de Walle, M. (2016). Attachment and depressive symptoms in middle childhood: The moderating role of skin conductance level variability. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 33(8): pp.1135–1148. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407515618278

Brennan, K. A., Clark, C. L., Shaver, P. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. In J. A. Simpson & W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships, pp.46–76. The Guilford Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1997-36873-002

Brenning, K., Soenens, B., Braet, C., Bosmans, G. (2011). An adaptation of the experiences in close relationships scale-revised for use with children and adolescents. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28(8): pp.1048–1072. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407511402418

Cassidy, J., Jones, J. D., Shaver, P. R. (2013). Contributions of attachment theory and research: a framework for future research, translation, and policy. Development and Psychopathology, 25(4 Pt 2): pp.1415–1434. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579413000692

Cassidy, J., & Shaver, P. R. (2008). Handbook of Attachment: Theory, Research, and Clinical Applications. In Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.

Fraley, R. C., Waller, N. G., Brennan, K. A. (2000). An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(2): pp.350–365. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.350

Idrees, M. U. N., Zahra, S. M., Naeem, F. (2021). Perceived parenting styles and primary attachment styles of single and children living with both parents. Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, 71(6): pp.1540–1544. https://doi.org/10.47391/JPMA.626

Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (T. Little, Ed.; 3rd ed.). Guilford Press.

Lansford, J. E., & Edu, L. (2025). Theories of parenting and child development in different cultural contexts. Theory and Society, 54: pp.851–865. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-025-09639-x

Lionetti, F., Mastrotheodoros, S., Palladino, B. E. (2018). Experiences in Close Relationships Revised Child version (ECR-RC): Psychometric evidence in support of a Security factor. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 15(4): pp.452–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2017.1297228

Marci, T., Moscardino, U., Altoè, G. (2019). The brief Experiences in Close Relationships Scale - Revised Child version (ECR-RC): Factor structure and invariance across middle childhood and early adolescence. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 43(5): pp.409–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025418785975

Pooravari, M., Fathi-Ashtiani, A., Salehi, S., Pooravari, M. (2017). Reliability, Validity, and Factor Structure of Experiences in Close Relationships Scale-Revised for Using in Children and Adolescents (ECR-RC). International Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 11(1): pp.5–10.

Skoczeń, I., Głogowska, K., Kamza, A., Włodarczyk, A. (2019). The Experiences in Close Relationships Scale-Revised Child version: Reliability and structural validity of the Polish adaptation. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 16(4): pp.488–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2017.1422719

Vu, B. T., Heel, M. Van, Finet, C., Cuyvers, B., Houbrechts, M., Hoang, T. D., Cao, T. A., Duong, H. H., Bosmans, G. (2022). Comparing attachment across cultures, child gender, age, and parental gender: Vietnamese versus Belgian adolescents’ self-reported attachment anxiety and avoidance. Psychological Assessment, 34(9): pp.846–859. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001143

Wongpakaran, N., Demaranville, J., Wongpakaran, T. (2021). Validation of the relationships questionnaire (Rq) against the experience of close relationship-revised questionnaire in a clinical psychiatric sample. Healthcare (Switzerland), 9(9): pp.1174. https://doi.org/10.3390/HEALTHCARE9091174/S1

Zhao, Y., Summers, R., Gathara, D., English, M. (2024). Conducting cross-cultural, multi-lingual or multi-country scale development and validation in health care research: A 10-step framework based on a scoping review. Journal of Global Health, 14: pp.04151. https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.14.04151

Downloads

Published

2026-06-09

How to Cite

Tsend, B., Nasanbat, N., Batsukh, E., Sainbat, U., Marsgerel, B., & Bat-Ulzii, N. (2026). Psychometric Properties of the Mongolian Version of the Experiences in Close Relationships–Revised Child Version . Lavai - International Journal of Education, 22(34), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.5564/lavai.v22i34.4598

Issue

Section

Articles