Impact of Booster Vaccination on Infection and Hospitalization Rates during the Mass Vaccination in Mongolia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24079/cajms.2025.03.002Keywords:
COVID-19 booster vaccination, vaccine effectiveness, frontline employees, increased risk population, infection and hospitalizationAbstract
Objective: Our study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of booster vaccination in preventing new COVID-19 infections and related hospitalizations among groups that received the primary vaccination series. Methods: Booster vaccination started on August 31, 2021, at recruitment in May 2022. By May 2022, 64% of the Mongolian population had received two primary doses of a COVID-19 vaccine, and 31% had received a booster dose. We followed 1,251 participants (459 males and 792 females, with a mean age of 41.5 ± 14.5 years [18–93], and a median age of 39.0 years) over six months, from the start of booster immunization on September 1, 2021, to February 28, 2022. We compared infection and hospitalization rates among vaccinated groups using logistic regression and calculated vaccine effectiveness (VE) for booster recipients with the formula: VE = 1 – (vaccinated rate/unvaccinated rate) × 100. Results: All participants received two doses of one of four vaccines used in the nationwide campaign. During the study period, we identified 449 new infection cases, accounting for 35.9% of all participants, and 150 subsequent hospitalizations, or 12.0% of the total. Participants who did not receive a booster demonstrated significantly higher infection rates compared to those who did. Booster vaccination provided notably better protection against new infections among frontline workers and reduced hospitalizations in high-risk groups. No significant differences were found in VE when comparing participants based on seroconversion after initial vaccination or the type of booster vaccine used.
Conclusion: Therefore, we concluded that COVID-19 booster vaccinations effectively enhanced protection against new SARS-CoV-2 infections among frontline healthcare workers, government employees, and individuals at higher risk for severe disease, thereby reducing their risk of hospitalization.
Downloads
178
References
1. Coronavirus (COVID19) Vaccinations. 2023. https://ourworldindata.org/covid-vaccinations.
2. WHO. COVID-19 Vaccines with WHO Emergency Use Listing. https://extranet.who.int/prequal/vaccines/covid-19-vaccines-who-emergency-use-listing.
3. WHO. SAGE roadmap for prioritizing the use of COVID-19 vaccines in the context of limited supply. 13 November 2020; https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/341448.
4. COVID-19 vaccination, World data. 2023. https://data.who.int/dashboards/covid19/vaccines?n=c.
5. Mongolia MoH. Interim guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of coronavirus infections (Covid 19). 2020.
6. Mahajan S, Caraballo C, Li SX, et al. SARS-CoV-2 Infection Hospitalization Rate and Infection Fatality Rate Among the Non-Congregate Population in Connecticut. Am J Med. 2021;134(6):812-816 e812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2021.01.020
7. Schechtman K. A User’s Guide to U.S. Vaccine Breakthrough Rates. 2022: https://www.rockefellerfoundation.org/perspective/a-users-guide-to-u-s-vaccine-breakthrough-rates/.
8. Abu-Raddad LJ, Chemaitelly H, Ayoub HH, et al. Effect of mRNA Vaccine Boosters against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Infection in Qatar. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(19):1804-1816. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2200797
9. Chemaitelly H, Ayoub HH, AlMukdad S, et al. Duration of mRNA vaccine protection against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 subvariants in Qatar. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):3082. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-30895-3
10. Cerqueira-Silva T, Katikireddi SV, de Araujo Oliveira V, et al. Vaccine effectiveness of heterologous CoronaVac plus BNT162b2 in Brazil. Nat Med. 2022;28(4):838-843. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-022-01701-w
11. Cerqueira-Silva T, de Araujo Oliveira V, Paixao ES, et al. Duration of protection of CoronaVac plus heterologous BNT162b2 booster in the Omicron period in Brazil. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):4154. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-31839-7
12. Zeng T, Lu Y, Zhao Y, et al. Effectiveness of the booster dose of inactivated COVID-19 vaccine against Omicron BA.5 infection: a matched cohort study of adult close contacts. Respir Res. 2023;24(1):246. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12931-023-02542-y
13. Sun J, Zheng Q, Anzalone AJ, et al. Effectiveness of mRNA Booster Vaccine Against Coronavirus Disease 2019 Infection and Severe Outcomes Among Persons With and Without Immune Dysfunction: A Retrospective Cohort Study of National Electronic Medical Record Data in the United States. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024;11(2):ofae019. https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae019
14. Liu D, Feng S, Sha F, et al. Inactivated SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Booster Against Omicron Infection Among Quarantined Close Contacts. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(10):e2339507. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.39507
15. Wong BK, Mabbott NA. Systematic review and meta-analysis of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine effectiveness against hospitalizations in adults. Immunother Adv. 2024;4(1):ltae011. https://doi.org/10.1093/immadv/ltae011
16. Plumb ID, Mohr NM, Hagen M, et al. Effectiveness of a Messenger RNA Vaccine Booster Dose Against Coronavirus Disease 2019 Among US Healthcare Personnel, October 2021-July 2022. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023;10(10):ofad457. https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad457
17. Robilotti EV, Whiting K, Lucca A, et al. Effectiveness of MRNA booster vaccine among healthcare workers in New York City during the Omicron surge, December 2021 to January 2022. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2022;28(12):1624-1628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2022.07.017
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mongolian National University of Medical Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.