Validation of the Mongolian Version of the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ) in Clinical Leaders of Hospital

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24079/CAJMS.2025.02.001

Keywords:

MLQ-5X, Leadership, Validation, Mongolia, Healthcare, Transpormational leadership, Psyhometric analysis

Abstract

Objective: Leadership is a critical determinant of healthcare quality, workforce development, and organizational performance. The Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ-5X), based on the Full Range Leadership Theory, is widely used to evaluate transformational, transactional, and passive-avoidant leadership styles. However, a culturally validated Mongolian version has not yet been available. This study aimed to translate, culturally adapt, and validate the MLQ-5X for clinical leaders working in hospitals across Mongolia. Methods: A cross-sectional methodological study was conducted between March and September 2022 in 11 provinces and Ulaanbaatar. The MLQ-5X was translated using WHO translation guidelines and underwent expert panel review, pilot testing, and psychometric evaluation. A total of 1,458 clinical leaders participated. Construct validity was assessed through Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analyses (EFA and CFtA). Reliability was measured using Cronbach’s alpha, and face validity was evaluated through participant feedback. Results: EFA supported the original nine-factor structure. CFA showed a good model fit (CFI = 0.93, TLI = 0.91, RMSEA = 0.056). Reliability was high across all subscales (α = 0.834–0.968), with overall reliability at 0.973. Face Validity Index scores indicated strong clarity (0.82) and comprehension (0.85). Conclusions: The Mongolian MLQ-5X is a valid and reliable tool for leadership assessment in healthcare settings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract
242
PDF
120

References

1. Cummings GG, Tate K, Lee S, et al. Leadership styles and outcome patterns for the nursing workforce and work environment: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2018;85:19-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.08.006

2. Curtis EA, de Vries J, Sheerin FK. Developing leadership in nursing: exploring core factors. Br J Nurs. 2011;11(4):179-185. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2011.20.5.306

3. Giltinane CL. Leadership styles and theories. Nurs Stand. 2013;27(41):35-39. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns2013.06.27.41.35.e7565

4. Bass BM, Avolio BJ. Improving Organizational Effectiveness Through Transformational Leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1994.

5. Wong CA, Cummings GG, Ducharme L. The relationship between nursing leadership and patient outcomes: a systematic review update. J Nurs Manag. 2013;21(5):709-724. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12116

6. Boamah SA, Spence Laschinger HK, Wong C, et al. Effect of transformational leadership on job satisfaction and patient safety outcomes. Nurs Outlook. 2018;66(2):180-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2017.10.004

7. McCleskey J. Situational, transformational, and transactional leadership and leadership development. Int J Bus Soc Sci. 2014;5(5):26-36.

8. Skogstad A, Einarsen S, Torsheim T, et al. The destructiveness of laissez-faire leadership behavior. J Occup Health Psychol. 2007;12(1):80-92. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.12.1.80

9. Avolio BJ, Bass BM. MLQ Manual and Sampler Set: Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. 3rd ed. Menlo Park, CA: Mind Garden; 2004.

10. Antonakis J, House RJ. Instrumental leadership: measurement and extension of transformational–transactional leadership theory. Leadersh Q. 2014;25(6):1058-1076. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.04.005

11. Yildiz A, Ayhan B, Erat S. The reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ-5X). J Nurs Manag. 2019;27(4):805-812.

12. Castro ML, Peres MA, Martins JT. Validation of the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire in the Brazilian context. Rev Bras Enferm. 2016;69(6):994-999. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2016-0084

13. Rowold J, Heinitz K. Transformational and charismatic leadership: assessing the convergent, divergent and criterion validity of the MLQ and the CKS. Leadersh Q. 2007;18(2):121-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LEAQUA.2007.01.003

14. Stander MW, Rothmann S. Psychological empowerment, job insecurity and employee engagement. J Psychol Afr. 2010;20(2):255-265. http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v36i1.849

15. McGuire E, Kennerly SM. Nurse managers as transformational and transactional leaders. J Nurs Adm. 2006;36(10):512-519.

16. Abrahamsen B. A longitudinal study of nurses’ leadership roles in Norwegian nursing homes. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2015;30(4):389-406.

17. Chen HL, Boore JRP. Translation and back-translation in qualitative nursing research: methodological review. J Clin Nurs. 2010;19(1-2):234-239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02896.x

18. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25(24):3186-3191. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014

19. Ministry of Health, Mongolia. Health Sector Strategic Master Plan 2021–2030. Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia: Ministry of Health; 2021.

20. World Health Organization, Mongolia Office. Country Cooperation Strategy 2020–2025. Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia: WHO; 2020.

21. Lehmann U, Dieleman M, Martineau T. Staffing remote rural areas in middle- and low-income countries: a literature review of attraction and retention. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008;8:19. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-8-19

22. World Health Organization. Increasing Access to Health Workers in Remote and Rural Areas Through Improved Retention: Global Policy Recommendations. Geneva: WHO; 2010.

23. Bass BM, Avolio BJ. Manual for the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (Form 5X). Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden; 1995.

24. Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling. 1999;6(1):1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

25. Aarons GA, Ehrhart MG, Farahnak LR. The implementation leadership scale (ILS): development of a brief measure of unit level implementation leadership. Implement Sci. 2014;9:45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-9-45

26. Al-Ali W, Singh SK, Al-Nahyan M, et al. Change management through leadership: the mediating role of organizational culture. Int J Organ Anal. 2017;25(4):723-739. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-05-2016-1025

27. Deci EL, Ryan RM. The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol Inq. 2000;11(4):227-268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

28. Antonakis J, Avolio BJ, Sivasubramaniam N. Context and leadership: an examination of the nine-factor full-range leadership theory using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Leadersh Q. 2003;14(3):261-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1048-9843(03)00030-4

29. Judge TA, Piccolo RF. Transformational and transactional leadership: a meta-analytic test of their relative validity. J Appl Psychol. 2004;89(5):755-768. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.755

30. Boateng GO, Neilands TB, Frongillo EA, et al. Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: a primer. Front Public Health. 2018;6:149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149

Downloads

Published

2025-06-30

How to Cite

Boldbaatar, B., Munkhtar, Y., Tsagaankhuu, S., Erdenebileg, N., Nyamdavaa, K., & Dambadarjaa, D. (2025). Validation of the Mongolian Version of the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ) in Clinical Leaders of Hospital. Central Asian Journal of Medical Sciences, 11(2), 46–55. https://doi.org/10.24079/CAJMS.2025.02.001

Issue

Section

Articles